1852
Comment:
|
6687
Responding to discussion
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
So whaddaya think of the new wiki then? -- ''SimonHuggins'' | #pragma section-numbers off |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
''Not bad, rather a lot of eye candy for my taste though, and it talks to me too much. Will investigate more later as am off to the pub soonish.'' --Kake | Feel free to discuss random issues with the wiki somewhere below here. Keeping some sensible format probably helps. |
Line 5: | Line 5: |
Ugh, and it makes me do the two single quotes instead of letting me do <i>, don't like. --Kake | = HuggieWikiDiscussion = |
Line 7: | Line 7: |
*shrug* that's just a different markup format. It seems more to fit in more with the rest of wiki formatting than <i> and <b> since those are HTML. I like the way you can have real templates and the way linking seems more sane. But it's written in Python so this may put some off :) Oh and you can turn a fair bit of the eyecandy off by removing the CSS and turning off emoticons etc. --''SimonHuggins'' | I think this wiki is a failure. |
Line 9: | Line 9: |
BTW if someone is good with colours and stylesheets and wants to send me alternatives then please do so --''SimonHuggins'' | Or at least it feels that way. I guess I must have some idealism left in me because I thought that in some way people might see this as an interesting thing, you know, somewhere you can add your own content and improve the existing content. I definitely used to be more idealistic after all I thought AcronymExpansions was a good idea (see the top of that page) once but I can see it really isn't now. |
Line 11: | Line 11: |
so if i type in here will it show up in the real world? | It's a bit like the FAQ I started for Parinux based on questions asked (and asked again) on the Linux mailing list. That FAQ may have helped people but I certainly never got the feedback for it that I thought I would. Feedback would have been useful to improve it but eventually I grew less interested in it and didn't have time to summarise questions on the list. Somehow I believed that having somewhere which was easier to edit would help people contribute and I fell in love with wikis. The wiki has been useful and groups have used it in the past effectively but often only for one page or a subset of pages without venturing outside. (e.g. EarthlingsInfo, ["NottLUG"] - mostly just the members list, ["OxLUG"] - mostly for the installfest stuff, the DebianExpoList) |
Line 13: | Line 13: |
Yes --''AlexWalker'' | I can't force people to use it nor would I want to but it's a shame to see it not really being used to its full potential. I guess earthlings are the people (besides me) who use it most. I think what I would really consider a success is when I look at RecentChanges and the top changes aren't me and aren't spam. I don't really know what that means. I guess I feel that CategoryComputingTips could be a lot more useful - there is after all a lot more knowledge out there - but that I don't really know how to make it so and without other people helping lack the motivation after all if no one is participating surely no one can be reading and yet there are people reading (well according to the webstats) and they can't ''all'' be just me. |
Line 15: | Line 15: |
Huggie - you should write your news the other way up - so that the latest is on top... that way when I look at it I won't think you wrote the last entry in April... --''AlexWalker'' | Equally I'm not sure why people would add information here. I mean, I don't know what this wiki has over others (apart from the earthling/nottlug/oxlug connections) and I don't have an idea of a particular category of information that people would be very likely to add to either. I'm lacking a killer sales pitch. Maybe we could start a tradition that for every page you view you have to add some interesting comment somewhere a bit like an Ob''''''Hack. But that's a little too structured really. |
Line 17: | Line 17: |
I don't think people read the news anyway and I don't really keep it much up to date but I'll bear it in mind. --''SimonHuggins'' | I don't mean to say that this is going away (though if you think it should feel free to say so :) ) and I also don't mean to be ungrateful for those that have contributed. Various friends of mine have added their bits or made existing pages better which is much appreciated. |
Line 19: | Line 19: |
I read it, though you never update it. :P --''JonathanMcDowell'' | It just feels slightly as though there's this great potential here that is going unharnessed. Maybe that's my idealism again. |
Line 21: | Line 21: |
Hmm... this all sounds oh so very familiar ... 0~=) --''PatrickMoore'' | -- ''SimonHuggins'' |
Line 23: | Line 23: |
If you really want news, then you should use [http://www.moveabletype.org/ Movable Type], that's what I use on [http://www.x3ja.co.uk/ My site]. It's really really good and really flexible, although probably not quite as flexible as a Wiki... erm, was that just a shameless plug for some software I like? Maybe. Oh yes, it makes it easier to keep a news page up to date when it's easy and looks good. That's why I said it, yes. --''AlexWalker'' | == Comments == I can see what you mean, and I have quite often set things up with the idealistic impression that everyone will find them useful. Mostly it's been stuff to do with [http://www.crossfire.org.uk Crossfire], namely a couple of attempts to get a discussion list running and, more recently, seeing if people were interested in [http://www.crossfire.org.uk/forums/ forums]. Even the [http://www.x3ja.co.uk. forums] on my own site only really get used when I set up a topic and tell people about it - it doesn't just get looked at. I also know that Graham set up some forums for ex-Jubilee campus (one campus of [http://www.nott.ac.uk/ Uni of Nottingham]) but that they don't really get many hits. I guess, as you say, all these things lack a major selling point. Maybe we need some help from a marketing guru :D Having said that, I found that my [http://www.x3ja.co.uk blog] along with others I host, have been rather successful. Although I kind of ran blogs on old websites, it was never the focus. I guess that's the major selling point for that isn't it? Think I might use my blog to advertise my forums a bit more :) Anyway, just my thoughts and empathisations (is that a word?!) -- ''AlexWalker'' ------ you are definitely limiting your market share to those people who have have clue about what wiki's are and what you do with them, which i don't think is many people but might be the only people you are interested in i suppose. i don't think this site has much structure either. you might want it to all be random, but a bit too random and it becomes confused and people don't know what they could add to it anyway. i don't really know though. maybe that's why it seems confused to me. so will this just appear on the page then? -- ''susie'' Yes Susie, it'll just appear :) I don't honestly believe it's that hard. If you want to find out how to add content then you will. I did after all. Your comments about structure are interesting though. I think people need to know: * to click on the title of a page * to use the text search * about Local''''''Site''''''Map * to get over their fear and just click! Go on you can do it! -- ''SimonHuggins'' ------ "Wikis wock" :) I just think they're ahead of their time a bit to be honest. That and the fact that people won't really /want/ to change the content of a site that isn't theirs, because that's a bit like trespassing. Add that to the fact that there are MIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLIIIIIIIIOOONNNNNNNNS of people's webshites out there and what you have is something that should stick out but probably doesn't to anyone other than those who know you *and* know of your wiki. That narrows the number down somewhat I would imagine. [http://carl.ebrey.net/ <Blatent_plug />] -- ''Carl'' But wikis have been around for like '''years'''. Since 1995 at least (cf Wiki:WikiHistory). I can understand the trespassing point but I'm not sure how to undo that. I guess the real issue is maybe that people don't have a lot of any worth to say and that they know that if they add rubbish it'll be deleted. Still even rubbish can be valuable in starting a discussion as it can be refactored. -- ''SimonHuggins'' ------ Some kind soul corrected AddingPages recently and someone else added bits to RandomStuff so perhaps all is not lost. -- ''SimonHuggins'' ## Suggested (but not forced) comment format. Might be a good idea to indent/not indent alternate comments. ## ------ ## My Comment -- ''SomeOne'' |
Feel free to discuss random issues with the wiki somewhere below here. Keeping some sensible format probably helps.
HuggieWikiDiscussion
- I think this wiki is a failure.
Or at least it feels that way. I guess I must have some idealism left in me because I thought that in some way people might see this as an interesting thing, you know, somewhere you can add your own content and improve the existing content. I definitely used to be more idealistic after all I thought AcronymExpansions was a good idea (see the top of that page) once but I can see it really isn't now.
It's a bit like the FAQ I started for Parinux based on questions asked (and asked again) on the Linux mailing list. That FAQ may have helped people but I certainly never got the feedback for it that I thought I would. Feedback would have been useful to improve it but eventually I grew less interested in it and didn't have time to summarise questions on the list. Somehow I believed that having somewhere which was easier to edit would help people contribute and I fell in love with wikis. The wiki has been useful and groups have used it in the past effectively but often only for one page or a subset of pages without venturing outside. (e.g. EarthlingsInfo, ["NottLUG"] - mostly just the members list, ["OxLUG"] - mostly for the installfest stuff, the DebianExpoList)
I can't force people to use it nor would I want to but it's a shame to see it not really being used to its full potential. I guess earthlings are the people (besides me) who use it most. I think what I would really consider a success is when I look at RecentChanges and the top changes aren't me and aren't spam. I don't really know what that means. I guess I feel that CategoryComputingTips could be a lot more useful - there is after all a lot more knowledge out there - but that I don't really know how to make it so and without other people helping lack the motivation after all if no one is participating surely no one can be reading and yet there are people reading (well according to the webstats) and they can't all be just me.
Equally I'm not sure why people would add information here. I mean, I don't know what this wiki has over others (apart from the earthling/nottlug/oxlug connections) and I don't have an idea of a particular category of information that people would be very likely to add to either. I'm lacking a killer sales pitch. Maybe we could start a tradition that for every page you view you have to add some interesting comment somewhere a bit like an ObHack. But that's a little too structured really.
I don't mean to say that this is going away (though if you think it should feel free to say so ) and I also don't mean to be ungrateful for those that have contributed. Various friends of mine have added their bits or made existing pages better which is much appreciated. It just feels slightly as though there's this great potential here that is going unharnessed. Maybe that's my idealism again.
-- SimonHuggins
Comments
I can see what you mean, and I have quite often set things up with the idealistic impression that everyone will find them useful. Mostly it's been stuff to do with [http://www.crossfire.org.uk Crossfire], namely a couple of attempts to get a discussion list running and, more recently, seeing if people were interested in [http://www.crossfire.org.uk/forums/ forums]. Even the [http://www.x3ja.co.uk. forums] on my own site only really get used when I set up a topic and tell people about it - it doesn't just get looked at. I also know that Graham set up some forums for ex-Jubilee campus (one campus of [http://www.nott.ac.uk/ Uni of Nottingham]) but that they don't really get many hits.
I guess, as you say, all these things lack a major selling point. Maybe we need some help from a marketing guru
Having said that, I found that my [http://www.x3ja.co.uk blog] along with others I host, have been rather successful. Although I kind of ran blogs on old websites, it was never the focus. I guess that's the major selling point for that isn't it? Think I might use my blog to advertise my forums a bit more
Anyway, just my thoughts and empathisations (is that a word?!)
-- AlexWalker
you are definitely limiting your market share to those people who have have clue about what wiki's are and what you do with them, which i don't think is many people but might be the only people you are interested in i suppose. i don't think this site has much structure either. you might want it to all be random, but a bit too random and it becomes confused and people don't know what they could add to it anyway. i don't really know though. maybe that's why it seems confused to me.
so will this just appear on the page then?
-- susie
Yes Susie, it'll just appear I don't honestly believe it's that hard. If you want to find out how to add content then you will. I did after all. Your comments about structure are interesting though. I think people need to know:
- to click on the title of a page
- to use the text search
about LocalSiteMap
- to get over their fear and just click! Go on you can do it!
-- SimonHuggins
"Wikis wock" I just think they're ahead of their time a bit to be honest. That and the fact that people won't really /want/ to change the content of a site that isn't theirs, because that's a bit like trespassing. Add that to the fact that there are MIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLIIIIIIIIOOONNNNNNNNS of people's webshites out there and what you have is something that should stick out but probably doesn't to anyone other than those who know you *and* know of your wiki. That narrows the number down somewhat I would imagine.
[http://carl.ebrey.net/ <Blatent_plug />]
-- Carl
But wikis have been around for like years. Since 1995 at least (cf WikiHistory). I can understand the trespassing point but I'm not sure how to undo that. I guess the real issue is maybe that people don't have a lot of any worth to say and that they know that if they add rubbish it'll be deleted. Still even rubbish can be valuable in starting a discussion as it can be refactored.
-- SimonHuggins
Some kind soul corrected AddingPages recently and someone else added bits to RandomStuff so perhaps all is not lost.
-- SimonHuggins